AI ObservatoryCosta Rica

State & Algorithm · No. 01

AI in Costa Rica's Public Sector: 21 projects, 7 institutions, and the questions no one has answered yet

Analysis of the first systematic inventory of AI projects in Costa Rica's public sector: what exists, what returns value, what is stalled, and what lacks coordination.

Mario Pérez EdwardsObservatorio IA Costa Rica

Executive Summary

  • 21 AI projects across 7 Costa Rican public institutions. 16 in production.
  • Poder Judicial (₡5,245M) and Hacienda (₡8,000M) have publicly documented financial returns. Both operate on pre-existing digital infrastructure.
  • Three CCSS models for detecting cancer, pulmonary disease, and acute coronary syndrome are stalled for ₡390M (less than 0.02% of the CCSS budget).
  • The National AI Center of Excellence, promised in ENIA 2024-2027, has no documented public operation.
  • There is no institutional obligation to share learnings or coordinate between entities.
21
Documented projects
7 public institutions
₡13.2B
Documented return
PJ + Hacienda, public data
367K
Patients resolved
CCSS list cleanup 2023–2026
₡390M
Stalled models
< 0.02% of CCSS budget
1

The Inventory: What Was Measured and How

The first systematic inventory of the Observatorio IA Costa Rica documented twenty-one AI projects in production or with verified status across seven Costa Rican public institutions. Twenty-one is a floor, not a ceiling: the inventory is ongoing.

Inclusion Criteria
  1. Verifiable public source: official statement, institutional declaration, or press coverage with confirmed data.
  2. Costa Rican public sector institution: central government, autonomous, or semi-autonomous.
  3. System that operates or has documented status: the announcement alone is insufficient; evidence of operation or current status is required.

Deliberately excluded: pilot-phase projects without public data, private sector initiatives, and university projects without public entity agreements.


2

Documented Financial Returns

Of the twenty-one projects, two have the highest level of evidence: financial returns publicly documented by the institution itself. Both share a structural condition: they operate on data infrastructure that already existed before the AI project.

Documented financial returns (₡ millions)
Financial return comparison: Hacienda ₡8,000M vs Poder Judicial ₡5,245M0₡2B₡4B₡6B₡8BHaciendaTax evasion 2025₡8,000MP. JudicialJudicial collections 2024₡5,245M
Sources: actualidadtributaria.com (Hacienda), observador.cr (P. Judicial)
Poder Judicial: Seven Years Under the Radar

The citizen service chatbot has been running since 2018, built internally without an external vendor. The budget prediction model for judicial debt collection (2019) expanded to more than 60 management centers with accumulated savings exceeding ₡100 million.

In 2024, the Poder Judicial processed ₡5,245 million in judicial collections without manual case-by-case review. The system classifies, prioritizes by recovery probability, and generates reports automatically.

transparencia.poder-judicial.go.cr · pj.poder-judicial.go.cr · observador.cr

Ministry of Finance: Built on E-Invoicing Infrastructure

In 2025, an anomaly detector applied to electronic invoice flows detected ₡8,000 million linked to simulated invoices. Costa Rica's e-invoicing system processes approximately 3 million receipts per day. That pre-existing infrastructure was the enabling condition for the detector.

actualidadtributaria.com

The return on government AI depends less on the model used and more on the quality of the data and systems that precede it. Institutions without that foundation cannot skip the step.


3

The Most Urgent Case: CCSS

If Poder Judicial and Hacienda represent what already works, CCSS represents both what works and what could work but is stalled.

Reduction in the waitlist cleanup rate (CCSS)
CCSS surgical waitlist cleanup rate: before 31.2%, after 18.2%31.2%cleanup rateBeforeStart 202318.2%cleanup rateAfterQ1 2026
367,403 patients resolved · 136,774 cases removed · Source: Teletica / CCSS

The bot that cross-references EDUS with the Civil Registry cleans surgical waitlists: deceased patients, those already treated, and duplicates. Between 2023 and Q1 2026, it resolved 367,403 patients and removed 136,774 cases. The cleanup rate dropped from 31.2% to 18.2%, indicating more accurate lists, not just shorter ones.

teletica.com

LIDIA model (type 2 diabetes)
CCSS LIDIA model: documented high accuracy in the type 2 diabetes detection pilotpilot1M+ records · Clínica Clorito Picado
Source: Observador.cr / Teletica
Models stalled for lack of budget
Breast cancer₡130M
Pulmonary diseases₡130M
Acute coronary syndrome₡130M
Total: ₡390M (< 0.02% of CCSS budget)
LIDIA: the working model and the three that are stalled

LIDIA is a machine learning model developed at Clínica Clorito Picado on more than one million EDUS records. It identifies at-risk type 2 diabetes patients with documented high accuracy in the pilot, enabling preventive intervention. The model costs ₡130 million (approx. USD 250,000).

Three additional models designed to detect breast cancer, pulmonary diseases, and acute coronary syndrome on the same dataset are stalled for lack of budget: ₡390 million in total (3 × ₡130M). That figure represents less than 0.02% of CCSS's ordinary budget.

observador.cr · teletica.com

Pending policy decision: If the cost of activating these models is verifiably lower than the cost of a preventable complication per late-detected case, the justification for inaction requires explicit argumentation. That argument does not exist in the public domain.


4

Timeline: AI in Government (2018–2026)

The documented projects span eight years. The most mature institutions—Poder Judicial and CCSS—started before a national strategy existed.

Timeline of AI in Costa Rica's public sector (2018–2026)
Timeline: from Poder Judicial's chatbot in 2018 to CCSS's LIDIA in 20262018PJ: CitizenChatbot2019PJ: BudgetPrediction2023CCSS: WaitlistCleanup2024ENIA publishedPJ: ₡5,245M collections2025Hacienda: ₡8,000MCONECTA / X-Road2026CCSS: EDUS Bot+ LIDIA pilot
Sources: Observatorio IA Costa Rica inventory, verified public sources

5

The Institutional Gap

The MICITT's National AI Strategy (ENIA) 2024-2027 promised a National AI Center of Excellence. Costa Rica was the first country in Central America to adopt a national AI policy. The center has no documented public operation.

Meanwhile, UCR conducts AI ethics research with Erasmus+ funding and CeNAT proposes LaNIA as an applied research platform. Each institution builds its own systems without a formal obligation to coordinate with MICITT or share learnings.

Poder Judicial created its own governance framework because no one else did: it is the only institution to have formally published guidelines for internal generative AI use, according to available public information. The practical result is that learnings from each institution are not available to others. Each starts from zero.

micitt.go.cr · ciodd.ucr.ac.cr · dplnews.com


The table includes the ten main projects documented with verifiable public data. The complete inventory contains twenty-one projects across seven institutions.

InstitutionProjectYearStatusImpact
CCSSWaitlist cleanup bot2023Active367,403 patients resolved
CCSSLIDIA (type 2 diabetes)2025PilotHigh pilot accuracy, 1M+ records
CCSSBreast cancer modelStalled₡130M required
CCSSPulmonary disease modelStalled₡130M required
CCSSAcute coronary syndrome modelStalled₡130M required
HaciendaTax evasion detector2025Active₡8,000M recovered
Poder JudicialCitizen chatbot2018Active24/7 service
Poder JudicialBudget prediction2019Active60+ centers, ₡100M+ saved
Poder JudicialAI judicial collections2024Active₡5,245M processed
Poder JudicialGenerative AI governance framework2024ActiveOnly public guideline

Selection of projects with verified public data. The full Observatory inventory includes 21 projects.


7

What's Next at the Observatory

This first edition of the inventory is a starting point, not a final state. The open questions that will guide future editions:

  • What is the total cost of the active projects? Returns are documented for PJ and Hacienda. Investment costs lack the same transparency.
  • Which institutions have the data infrastructure for the next project? MEP, SUTEL, and municipalities have data. The question is whether they have the structure to use it.
  • When will the three LIDIA models be activated? The budget decision has a deadline. So does the follow-up.

The inventory accepts corrections and additions. If you work at a public institution with an AI project that is not documented, the channel is open.